Wal-Mart Lobbying For FDI In India

There is news report that Wal-Mart is still lobbying for enter into Indian market. It should be welcomed by the government of India, which has decided to open retail sector for foreign Direct Investment ( FDI ). It is not a matter of making hue and cry. Wal-Mart is coming in India for social works. It is coming in India to provide jobs to jobless youths. It is coming in India to protect the interest of small shopkeepers, who are earning their livelihoods by opening up small shops. But there is a bad news also that is Wal-Mart wants to open its shops only in big cities and rural India is not in its priority list. It is matter of great concern. It will be injustice for the people of small cities and villages. The government should ensure that retail shops of Wal-Mart be opend in each village. Otherwise the country Will be deprived from the real benifit. And purpose of the government will not serve. The Prime Minister Manmohan Singh should raise the issue with the US president Obama. It is being said that retail gaint is extremely worry for the welfare of small Indian shopkeepers. The retail gaint wants to increase the income of Indian shopkeepers by establishing its own mega market. According to humor-Satire reporter manging director of Wal-Mart has given necessary directions to identify those areas, where shopkeepers can be directly benifited by opening up mega market of Wal-Mart. The government has assured the opposition party that there is no possiblity of any tsunami with entering Wal-Mart into Indian retail sector. The government further says that if tsunami like situation would appear after Wal-Mart entering then It has magic stick to lower the effect. The government has hoped that the opposition parties will be ready to welcome the Wal- Mart after the government assurances. The government has also hoped that the opposition would cooperate with the government, in the larger interest of the people. The government is of the view that Wal-Mart is as necessary as British East India Company. The country had been largely benefited from the British East India Company in Pre-independent era. It had ensured the development of the country. It had created job opportunity and it had provided jobs to unemployed youths. The government has cautioned that if unnecessary hindrance was created and entry of Wal-Mart was stopped, then the country may lose the greatest opportunity. The government also said that without allowing entry to Wal-Mart into Indian retail sector, the country can't be made a super power. The government also said that wherever the Wal-Mart has opened its retail shops small shopkeepers have been hugely benefited.

Skyrocketing Price Of Onion

The Price of onion is being skyrocketing. It has touched Rs 100-mark. It is good news for all. It is good news for the government also, because it can make it an election issue. United Progressive Alliance government now proudly may say to the voters about this unique achievement. The government may say that its policies are pro- poor The government may say that it has honoured onion, which was neglected. It is matter of pride for onion also. They may now come out from inferiority complex that they are less from any vegetables. The government may say to the world that the people of the country are so rich that they do not mind skyrocketing price of onion. The public may feel proud that at least in the government's view they are rich . Poor standard of living of the people, doesn't matter. By allowing skyrocketing price of onion, the government may give beffiting reply to its critics that it doesn't take proactive steps to boost the country's economy. The government also may say to the world community that it has searched a solution of the global slowdown. By allowing skyrocketing prices of essential commodities, the impact of slowdown can be lowered. Several countries have expressed happiness over the new discovery of Indian government. They have said that with the new reserch, the world would be largely benefited and global slowdown will become thing of past days.

Rahul Gandhi's Emotional Speech

Every one has right to be emotional. No one can impose ban on being emotional in democratic India, especially during election time. Political leaders have every right to be emotional and to make emotional to voters. The opposition parties should not make hue and cry over Rahul Gandhi's emotional speeches. Because election has not been over . Other parties' leaders have enough time to deliver emotional speeches. They should not waste time in Rahul Gandhi's criticism. Instead they should thik something concrete. The Congress General Secretary has just followed the old healthy tradition of Indian politics. Rahul Gandhi should be praised that he has gained political maturity. Instead of being critics the opposition parties should invest their energy in how to lower the effect of Rahul Gandhi's emotional speeches. They should make some concrete plan in this regard. According to humor- Satire reporter the opposition parties have made some special and unique plan to counter the Rahul Gandhi's effect. For example, all parties have decided that in the forthcoming parliamentary election they will not raise the emotional issue like caste and religion. Instead they would contest election on the issue of development. Actually, the opposition's leaders are of the view that if they will not raise the emotional issue then Rahul will be isolated in politically and voters would not vote in his party favour. The opposition leaders are of the view that Indians have become politically mature. They do not affect from emotional speeches. So it will be not right for them to raise emotional issues. According to unconfirmed report after delivering emotional speeches Rahul has been isolated within his own party. Unconfirmed report also says that some Congress leaders have termed Rahul's speeches as rubbish and they have decided to oppose such speeches. Political pundits see it as a sea change in Congress Party because fist time some party leader have said Rahul's speeches as irresponsible and illogical.

Narendra Modi Vs Rahul Gandhi

Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi is not anti-Muslim. Believe it or not but it is true. This fact was revealed when he criticised the congress general secretary Rahul Gandhi for his allegedly remarks in which he had said that some youths of Muslim community were in touch of ISI during Uttar Pradesh's Muzaffarnagar communal disturbances. Modi said that Rahul Gandhi should reveal the names of such youths. "After failing do so he should publicly apolgies" he added. He also said that Rahul Gandhi should not defame the entire community. It is being said that after his criticism of Rahul Gandhi, Narendra Modi is being popular among Muslim community. While Rahul Gandhi's popularity graph is being down. According humor- satire reporter after this BJP seems assure about its victory in forthcoming parliamentary election. Party think tanks are of the view Muslim would now forget about Gujarat's riot. The party also thinks that BJP would alone bring two third majority in coming election, while Congress would receive humiliating defeat in the election. Congress seems in damage control mode after this episode. According to an unconfirmed report, a high level meeting held at the Congress president Soniya Gandhi's residence to access the damage from Rahul Gandhi's statement. In the meeting, it was decided that all efforts will be done to woo the voters of Muslim community. According to humor-satire reporter some leaders of Congress Party have been given task to recite secularism mantra. The party has advised to its leaders to recite the mantra of Batla house encounter also.

Narendra Modi And United States (US)

My home has changed into battle field. My wife has finally decided to divorce me. All high level talks have been failed in finding the solution. Although the matter of dispute is simple. I am against of modi and the BJP. While my wife is a great fane of Gujrat chief minister Narendra Modi. She is of the view that after becoming PM, Modi will ensure all round development of the country. She is also of the view that he can only construct a grand temple at Ayodhya. While i think that if he would become PM then communal voilence may erupt in the country and social fabric may destroy. I am also of the view that Narendra Modi may pose a threat to secularism. He may impose ban on reciting of secularism, a favourite mantra of so-called secularists. After a lot of discussion, no settlement was reched. All high level talks failed even obama intervention has been meaningless . US president Obama has expressed fear that if the issue was not settle of my family, then peace and stability of south Asia may be affected. So, he has sent a special envoy to India to discuss the matter. He also said that he is considering about military action. In the meantime foreign affiar minister in a statement said that dispute of a Indian family is a internal matter of India and no third party intervention will be accepted. The Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has also expressed worry over the taking interest of US in a family dispute of India. He said that he would personally raise the issue with the President Obama. He said that such act of US would affect the relations between the two countries. The prime minister Manmohan Singh has hoped that finally matter will be solved amicably. Russia has condemned the US intervention in an Indian family dispute. Russia has said that US wants to serve its narrow interest. Leaders of the world community have condemned the US and have demanded that the special session of United Nation be convened to discuss the issue.