Vegetables Price Rise

Price rise is not always bad as it is considered. Because It provides opportunity to people to uplift their social status. If you buy onions, potatoes and tomatoes despite their skyrocketing price, then people will be highly impressed and they will consider you affluent. So those who are willing to upgrade their social status they should start buying onion, potatoes and tomatoes. Believe it or not people will not understand you rich from riding car instead they will decide your status from buying onions potatoes and tomatoes. Those who are in search of bridegroom for their daughters and want to know standard of living of bridegroom's family, then they should go to vegetable markets to see buying vegetables. If bridegroom's family buys onion, potatoes and tomatoes then the family income is good and if the family is not buying these vegetables then the family is below standard and marrying daughter will be not right in this fanily. Price rise is also helpfull for Income Tax Department because The income tax department can easily identify those persons who are hiding their actual income and evading from paying tax. The price rise of vegetables have provided a rare opportunity to identify such persons. Officers of income tax department should ensure installing cameras in vegetable markets and they should keep close eyes, who are buying onion, tomatoes and potatoes these days. Those who are buying, means they are affluent and they fall under the category of tax payee. And those who are not buying, do not come in category of tax payee. In this scenario, for a person, it will tough to hide his income, because during buying vegetables his status will be easily reveal that from which class he belongs. Similarly the crime department also may get vital clues regarding illegal activities from vegetable markets. The police department should also deploy police force in vegetable market in good number because chain snatcher will probably snatch vegetables instead of chain nowadays, seeing huge profit in it.

Rahul Gandhi's Emotional Speech

Every one has right to be emotional. No one can impose ban on being emotional in democratic India, especially during election time. Political leaders have every right to be emotional and to make emotional to voters. The opposition parties should not make hue and cry over Rahul Gandhi's emotional speeches. Because election has not been over . Other parties' leaders have enough time to deliver emotional speeches. They should not waste time in Rahul Gandhi's criticism. Instead they should thik something concrete. The Congress General Secretary has just followed the old healthy tradition of Indian politics. Rahul Gandhi should be praised that he has gained political maturity. Instead of being critics the opposition parties should invest their energy in how to lower the effect of Rahul Gandhi's emotional speeches. They should make some concrete plan in this regard. According to humor- Satire reporter the opposition parties have made some special and unique plan to counter the Rahul Gandhi's effect. For example, all parties have decided that in the forthcoming parliamentary election they will not raise the emotional issue like caste and religion. Instead they would contest election on the issue of development. Actually, the opposition's leaders are of the view that if they will not raise the emotional issue then Rahul will be isolated in politically and voters would not vote in his party favour. The opposition leaders are of the view that Indians have become politically mature. They do not affect from emotional speeches. So it will be not right for them to raise emotional issues. According to unconfirmed report after delivering emotional speeches Rahul has been isolated within his own party. Unconfirmed report also says that some Congress leaders have termed Rahul's speeches as rubbish and they have decided to oppose such speeches. Political pundits see it as a sea change in Congress Party because fist time some party leader have said Rahul's speeches as irresponsible and illogical.

US Intervention In Sriya

The possiblity of US military intervention in Sriya has increased. White house spokesperson in a regular press briefing made it clear that US can not tolerate family dispute in Syria. The spokesperson further said that the present Syrian government is not taking any interest in solving the family dispute of a Syrian family, so the change of regime has become necessary in the Syria. He also said that in light of it, the US intervention seems inevitable. He further said that US can not go back from its international commitment to take all possible measures to make the world secure to live. So United State America has every right to intervene in internal matter of any country. Experts are of the view that with US intervention world may divide into two poles and world war may erupt. Experts say that only a fresh war can help United States America to overcome from its present economic crisis. However some experts differ from previous views and say that the US intervention will ensure development in Syria. Russia has condemned the US intention in context of Sriya. Russia has said that US intervension will enhance a fresh round of conflict, which will be not in interest of people of Syria. Several other nations have also condemned the US intervention and demanded that the special session of United Nation be convened to discuss the issue. India has also expressed strong objections over possible US intervention in Syria and said that such act may enhance arm race in the world. India has also said that dream to make the world free from wepons of mass destruction will be not fulfilled if US doesn't leave such unnecessary intervention.